|
|
||||||||
1 University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
As psychotherapists, we rarely examine the implicit or explicit notions about human nature that are built into our theories and treatment approaches. Aside from the controversial question of whether a scientific conception of human nature is now tenable or not, our unexamined views (including our unrecognized biases) hold powerful sway in our clinical activities as well as in our theoretical discourse. As a consequence, our unexamined views of human nature may adversely affect our conduct of psychotherapy. Comparing Freuds view of human nature with that of Kohut, we can recognize their respective impact on the treatment process and its outcome.
Accepted on March 2, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. BURNS, E. GUTHRIE, F. MARINO-FRANCIS, C. BUSBY, J. MORRIS, E. RUSSELL, F. MARGISON, S. LENNON, and J. BYRNE Brief psychotherapy in Alzheimer's disease: Randomised controlled trial The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 187(2): 143 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ALL ISSUES | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |