J Psychother Pract Res DSM-IV-TR Content Alerting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milbrath, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milbrath, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Psychodynamic Therapy
J Psychother Pract Res 8:40-54, January 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Sequential Consequences of Therapists' Interventions

Constance Milbrath, Ph.D., Michael Bond, M.D., Steven Cooper, Ph.D., Hans J. Znoj, Ph.D., Mardi J. Horowitz, M.D. and J. Christopher Perry, M.D., M.P.H.

Received May 14, 1998; revised July 29, 1998; accepted August 21, 1998. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, and the Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Address correspondence to Dr. Bond, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital 4333 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E4, Canada.

Using sequential analysis, the authors examined how therapists' actions related to the verbal disclosure and defensive patterns that followed therapists' interventions within a single therapy hour for 20 patients. At the same time, a new measure, the Psychodynamic Intervention Rating Scale (PIRS), was tested for reliability and construct validity. Results indicated that therapists fit their styles of intervention to patients' levels of distress and functioning. Within the session, patient's emotional elaboration was followed by therapist's defense interpretation, followed by more patient emotional elaboration. Patient elaboration of significance was followed by more transference interpretation, followed by more patient elaboration of significance. Noninterpretive interventions were followed by patient's disclosure of facts, not emotion. Both interpretive intervention process sequences and therapist's use of support predicted posttreatment symptom reduction. The PIRS was shown to have satisfactory reliability and construct validity. (The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 1999; 8:40–54)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
M. Schechter
The Patient's Experience of Validation in Psychoanalytic Treatment
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2007; 55(1): 105 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
M. Bond and J. C. Perry
Long-Term Changes in Defense Styles With Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depressive, Anxiety, and Personality Disorders
Focus, July 1, 2005; 3(3): 429 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Bond and J. C. Perry
Long-Term Changes in Defense Styles With Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depressive, Anxiety, and Personality Disorders
Am J Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 161(9): 1665 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Psychother. Pract. Res.Home page
E. Banon, M. Evan-Grenier, and M. Bond
Early Transference Interventions With Male Patients in Psychotherapy
J Psychother Pract Res., April 1, 2001; 10(2): 79 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association