J Psychother Pract Res
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bøgwald, K.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Sørbye, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bøgwald, K.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Sørbye, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Psychodynamic Therapy
J Psychother Pract Res 8:264-273, October 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Measurement of Transference Interpretations

Kjell-Petter Bøgwald, M.D., Per Høglend, M.D., Ph.D. and Øystein Sørbye, M.D.

Received April 16, 1999; accepted June 3, 1999. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Norway. Address correspondence to Dr. Bøgwald, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 85 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway; e-mail: k.p.bogwald{at}psykiatri.uio.no

The authors present a cost-efficient process rating scale for detailed measurement of how much transference interpretations and related therapist interventions are used in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Theoretical and methodological considerations on how to operationalize and quantify such therapeutic interventions are discussed. The scale had highly satisfactory interrater reliability for three raters, who rated 60 whole sessions from an ongoing randomized study of two manualized forms of brief dynamic psychotherapy. In one treatment group, moderate emphasis on transference analysis was intended. In the other, minor or no use of the studied component was intended. The two treatment groups differed significantly in the use of transference interpretations and related interventions. There was no significant difference in therapists' general therapeutic skill or use of supportive interventions. The treatment differentiation was consistent with the manuals.

Key Words: Transference • Brief Dynamic Psychotherapy • Process Scale • Therapist Interventions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Hoglend, K.-P. Bogwald, S. Amlo, A. Marble, R. Ulberg, M. C. Sjaastad, O. Sorbye, O. Heyerdahl, and P. Johansson
Transference Interpretations in Dynamic Psychotherapy: Do They Really Yield Sustained Effects?
Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 165(6): 763 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Hoglend, S. Amlo, A. Marble, K.-P. Bogwald, O. Sorbye, M. C. Sjaastad, and O. Heyerdahl
Analysis of the Patient-Therapist Relationship in Dynamic Psychotherapy: An Experimental Study of Transference Interpretations
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 163(10): 1739 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Psychother. Pract. Res.Home page
P. Høglend, K.-P. Bøgwald, S. Amlo, O. Heyerdahl, O. Sørbye, A. Marble, M. C. Sjaastad, and H. Bentsen
Assessment of Change in Dynamic Psychotherapy
J Psychother Pract Res., October 1, 2000; 9(4): 190 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association