J Psychother Pract Res DSM-IV-TR Content Alerting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Høglend, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bentsen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Høglend, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bentsen, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Psychodynamic Therapy
J Psychother Pract Res 9:190-199, October 2000
© 2000 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Assessment of Change in Dynamic Psychotherapy

Per Høglend, M.D., Ph.D., Kjell-Petter Bøgwald, M.D., Svein Amlo, M.D., Oscar Heyerdahl, M.D., Øystein Sørbye, M.D., Alice Marble, Psy.D., Mary Cosgrove Sjaastad, M.D. and Håvard Bentsen, M.D., Ph.D.

Received December 3, 1999; revised May 15, 2000; accepted June 9, 2000. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Norway. Address correspondence to Dr. Høglend, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 85, Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway.

Five scales have been developed to assess changes that are consistent with the therapeutic rationales and procedures of dynamic psychotherapy. Seven raters evaluated 50 patients before and 36 patients again after brief dynamic psychotherapy. A factor analysis indicated that the scales represent a dimension that is discriminable from general symptoms. A summary measure, Dynamic Capacity, was rated with acceptable reliability by a single rater. However, average scores of three raters were needed for good reliability of change ratings. The scales seem to be sufficiently fine-grained to capture statistically and clinically significant changes during brief dynamic psychotherapy.

Key Words: Rating Scales • Outcome • Brief Psychotherapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Hoglend, K.-P. Bogwald, S. Amlo, A. Marble, R. Ulberg, M. C. Sjaastad, O. Sorbye, O. Heyerdahl, and P. Johansson
Transference Interpretations in Dynamic Psychotherapy: Do They Really Yield Sustained Effects?
Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 165(6): 763 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Hoglend, S. Amlo, A. Marble, K.-P. Bogwald, O. Sorbye, M. C. Sjaastad, and O. Heyerdahl
Analysis of the Patient-Therapist Relationship in Dynamic Psychotherapy: An Experimental Study of Transference Interpretations
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 163(10): 1739 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
R. F. Bornstein, K. J. Geiselman, E. A. Eisenhart, and M. A. Languirand
Construct Validity of the Relationship Profile Test: Links With Attachment, Identity, Relatedness, and Affect
Assessment, December 1, 2002; 9(4): 373 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Psychother. Pract. Res.Home page
A. G. Hersoug, P. Hoglend, J. T. Monsen, and O. E. Havik
Quality of Working Alliance in Psychotherapy: Therapist Variables and Patient/Therapist Similarity as Predictors
J Psychother Pract Res., October 1, 2001; 10(4): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association